![]() ![]() Take away those little features, and you’d eliminate the result-viewers would prefer the straight cut. I was discussing this with the students in my film and psychology class, and we decided that some of the small incidental features of the movies used to demonstrate the overlap preference caused the result. BRAIN EXPERT CLIPART MOVIEThese extrapolations could easily compensate for a moment of perceptual disconnect caused by a movie edit. Second, there is plenty of research demonstrating that our perceptual system can extrapolate forward when something disappears. First, people blink all the time, producing disruptions that are in some ways like movie edits, and the world sure doesn’t wait around for a moment while we recover from blinking. Does this need to “catch up” mean that movie edits are an “unnatural” disruption to our normal process of seeing? What did you think about this idea? So, repeating a little of the action would allow for that additional time and produce the “smoothest” edit because the action is just where the delayed brain expects it to be. The researchers who observed this preference hypothesized that the brain needs a moment to “catch up” on its processing after the disruption of an edit. Viewers seemed to choose a three-frame overlap as the best one. More recently, another study found the opposite. One study found that viewers seemed to like a small jump forward best. If you ask film editors, some will say that an exact match is best, some say that a small overlap is best and some say that skipping ahead is best. The interesting thing about this question is that everyone disagrees about its answer. ![]() Or maybe you skip forward just a bit-allowing the second shot to start a few frames after the first left off. ![]() What did you explore in your latest research?Īt some level, the question is simple: How do you edit a movie scene where you cut from one shot that shows the beginning of an action to a second shot that shows the end of that same action? Do you start the second shot exactly where the first left off? Or maybe you should overlap a little, allowing the second shot to repeat a few frames of the action that was already shown in the first shot. Levin recently spoke to MyVU about his new research article, “ Perceiving versus scrutinizing: Viewers do not default to awareness of small spatiotemporal inconsistencies in movie edits ,” and the unexpected findings that may change perceptions about how people view movie scenes. The group’s discoveries resulted in newly published research in the journal Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. He and his students have explored how people perceive the sequence of natural visual events and how they represent space while viewing films. Research in Levin’s lab focuses on the interface between concepts and visual perception. Levin, a professor of psychology and human development at Peabody College of education and human development, teaches Film and Psychology in addition to other classes that examine how cognitive science and the arts collide. The integration of cinema and science is at the foundation of Vanderbilt University professor Daniel Levin’s research. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |